FCI Knowledge System of Record
Complete research corpus with 16 foundational papers, ontology schemas, and citation maps.
Foundations, formal models, runtime systems, and evaluation protocols. Organized by research program rather than a flat publication list, with persistent identifiers, verified evidence, and inspectable code.
An interdisciplinary research program for formally describing, measuring, modeling, and predicting human-computer interaction.
A platform-native relational field runtime. Elements bend the field; the field bends them back.
Provenance-aware runtime semantic projection and operational semantic graphs in Rust.
A normative candidate for high-uncertainty decisions with AI panels and human decision authority.
A protocol-neutral architecture for separating interface meaning from interface expression.
Bounded autonomy, evidence qualification, and retrieval timing in autonomous agent systems.
Boundary review, minimum ontology, and discipline test
Evaluates whether interaction can stand as an independent scientific explanandum without reduction to computer science, psychology, or engineering. Establishes the initial discipline criteria and minimum boundary definitions.
Asks whether interaction itself can serve as a primary object of scientific explanation rather than merely a property of humans, machines, communication, cognition, or environments. Compares twelve scientific disciplines and formal traditions.
Analyzes eighteen natural, social, formal, engineering, and interdisciplinary fields to examine how mature sciences construct primary objects, natural kinds, mechanisms, and levels of explanation.
Representation is not one homogeneous relation. Examines semiotics, logic, visualization, compilers, and databases to establish a typed projection model where transformations preserve declared invariants.
Cross-disciplinary analysis showing that ontology, semantics, representation, and behavior cannot be treated as a simple hierarchy. Distinguishes formal semantic structures from situated interpretations.
Disentangles action availability across ecological psychology, HCI, reinforcement learning, control, and formal methods. Distinguishes enabled actions, authorized transitions, perceived opportunities, and recovery paths.
Tests whether interaction is primitive or reducible to established constructs (cybernetic feedback, communication, synchronized state transition). Derives a formal coupling model over dual state spaces.
Formulates a scientific representation of computational behavior independent of specific user interface technologies, bridging psychology, reinforcement learning, and formal process models.
Establishes measurement contracts separating physical trace events, task outcomes, and inferred latent psychological constructs (workload, confidence, discoverability).
Formalizes interaction equivalence and similarity across trace equivalence, simulation, bisimulation, and feature-weighted geometric distance, proving where simple distance metrics fail.
Distinguishes interaction transfer from simple repetition, familiarity, or learning. Models how prior interaction experience influences performance, strategy, and adaptation under changed conditions.
Defines interaction strategies as latent, goal-directed organizational policies distinct from single actions, plans, or heuristics, providing inference rules without reifying intent.
Evaluates candidate formalisms (Petri nets, labeled transition systems, process algebras, Markov decision processes, category-theoretic wiring diagrams) against empirical interaction requirements.
Establishes a predictive ontology distinguishing local empirical laws (Fitts, Hick-Hyman, GOMS) from typed distributional forecasts over horizon-bounded interaction trajectories.
Develops a gate-and-profile comparison methodology rejecting one-dimensional usability scores. Requires admissibility gates on target, population, observation model, and multi-criteria profiles.
Synthesizes the 15 preceding studies into an integrated epistemological evaluation. Demonstrates that interaction constitutes a legitimate primary scientific object while identifying inherited mechanisms.
Examines why component-bound state machines fail to capture interactive tension, and how a continuous relational force field creates coherent physical presence in digital systems.
Presents a method for autonomous agents to inspect, slice, and reason over typed program subgraphs without accessing complete source trees, preserving safety invariants.
Formulates mathematical conditions under which two distinct rendered interfaces can be proven equivalent projections of a single underlying semantic specification.
Analyzes model entropy and confidence signals to determine the precise threshold where parametric generation must yield to active context retrieval, minimizing both latency and hallucination.
Develops domain representation techniques that bound decision spaces before inference, ensuring autonomous systems operate only within validated state boundaries.
Complete research corpus with 16 foundational papers, ontology schemas, and citation maps.
Deterministic C11 implementation of the core interaction ontology and transition checker.
Audited bibliography of 130+ primary scientific literature sources across 18 disciplines in BibTeX, APA, and CSL JSON.
Renderer-agnostic core simulation engine and mathematical force solvers.
DOM observers, layout synchronizers, and field coordinate projection.
Multi-crate Cargo workspace providing runtime descriptors, macros, and metaobjects.
Rust MCP server and Blender add-on with reflective tool dispatch and spatial streaming.
Normative candidate specification and limited, tested software components. Effectiveness is unvalidated.
Complete specification documents, JSON schemas, and architectural invariants.
Engine for documentation-first, evidence-qualified autonomous agent operations.
Operating substrate for bounded agent projects with explicit authority and context.